DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2016-10-20 17:07
Sixth Circuit: Substantial Risk of Harm and Mitigation Costs Sufficient to Confer Standing in Data Breach Case
Related news
- The Ninth Circuit Revives Consumer Class Action, Finding Intangible Harm Sufficient to Confer Article III Standingjdsupra.com
- U.S. Supreme Court: Alleging Discriminatory Transfer Is Sufficient Harm to Bring Title VII Claimjdsupra.com
- 11th Circuit Adds to Circuit Split, Holding Threat of Future Harm and Associated Mitigation Efforts Is Not Enough to Confer Article III Standing on Data Breach Victimsjdsupra.com
- Sixth Circuit Upholds Validity of Medicare Audit Despite Lack of Notice, Citing Lack of Substantial Prejudicejdsupra.com
- OSportman’s Bowl requires substantial mitigation workoliverchronicle.com
Sheriff urges ‘harm mitigation’ for school shootingsflcourier.com- Fourth Department: Interest in Architecture and Historic Preservation Not Sufficient to Confer Standing Under SEQRAjdsupra.com
- Facts in Complaint That Arguably Show Patent Ownership Are Sufficient to Confer Standingjdsupra.com
- Ninth Circuit: Lost interest of under $4 sufficient to confer standing in consumer class actionjdsupra.com
- District Court Rules “Informational Injury” Sufficient to Confer Article III Standingjdsupra.com
- Third Circuit Rules that a Single Voicemail on a Cell Phone is Sufficient to Confer Standing for a TCPA Claimjdsupra.com
- CFIUS Reports Substantial Increase in Use of Mitigation Measures in 2022jdsupra.com
- No Harm, Yes Foul: FTC Rules Risk of Consumer Harm Sufficient to Find LabMD Liable for Security Breach.jdsupra.com
- Collecting Biometric Data Without Consent is Sufficient Harm to Base an Actionjdsupra.com
- No Actual Harm Needed to Sue Under BIPA: Illinois Supreme Court Finds Statutory Violation Sufficientjdsupra.com
- Spokeo II : On Remand from Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Finds Statutory Violation of Fair Credit Reporting Act Sufficient to Confer Article III Standingjdsupra.com
- Data Breach Class Actions – Eleventh Circuit Finds Allegations of “Increased Risk” of Harm Insufficient to Confer Standingjdsupra.com
- Ninth Circuit Holds That Consumer Alleging FCRA Claim against Spokeo Sufficiently Pled a Concrete Harm to Confer Article III Standingjdsupra.com
- Eleventh Circuit Finds Single Text Message Insufficient to Demonstrate Concrete Harm to Confer Article III Standing Under TCPAjdsupra.com
- Is a Dispute Between Private Parties to a Subcontract Agreement Issued Against a Government Contract Sufficient to Confer Federal Question Jurisdiction?jdsupra.com